Connect with us

Editorials

5 Exceptional Park Chan-wook Films!

Published

on

Park Chan-wook is the Quentin Tarantino of South Korea. An unsung hero that has had massive influence over myriad American filmmakers, Park is the master of blending horrific material and dark comedy seamlessly, until the viewer finds his or herself laughing at something that would never normally pass as acceptable. He is noted for the exploitative nature of his films, but Park doesn’t quite see himself that way — he simply seeks to pull emotion out of his viewers, because to Park, there’s no point in watching a film that only soothes the nerves. Inspired by the works of Therese Raquin and Franz Kafka, Park’s films often feature beautifully strung together narratives more reminiscent of literary works than cinema, filled with heavy noir elements, and surreal, vivid palettes that make even the most grotesque imagery appear comely.

Park’s newest film, The Handmaid, is an adaptation of Sarah Waters’ history crime novel Fingersmith, set in the Victorian era. Currently filming, Park’s version of the film will take place in a more recent time, specifically during the Japanese rule of Korea. With the first image from his upcoming film having recently been released, what better time to catch up on some of Park’s best films to date than the present? Read on, and discover some of Park’s most accomplished gems, or revisit a beloved classic that might already sit on your shelf, just in time for the newest addition to Park’s already impressive resume.

thirst-bakjwi1

  1. Thirst (Bakjwi)
     
    In an unusual, yet fascinating approach to vampirism, a character is turned into a member of the undead in the most unlikely of circumstances. Priest Sang-hyeon set out on a journey to help find a cure for a deadly blood disease, but despite his good intentions, things go horribly awry. When this man of the cloth is unknowingly administered a blood transfusion from a creature of the night, he becomes cursed with the gift of everlasting life; damned to walk the earth a monster for all of eternity. At first, Sang-hyeon is delighted with his newfound freedom, exercising his bloodlust and exemplified physical prowess and fresh batch of confident courage with curious glee. However, as his cravings expand to include the wife of his married acquaintance, he grows to fear the engorged malice growing within him, and clings to the regimented morality of his past life — the one that now feels so unattainable and far away. Aside from the obvious religious commentary, this Bride of Frankenstein esque tale mainly focuses on the dangers of forbidden romance, and how engaging in shared recidivism can lead to the deterioration of supposed lovers.

    chanwook01_body

  2. Lady Vengeance (Chinjeolhan geumjassi)
     
    The full title of this film is actually Sympathy for Lady Vengeance (although it can be referred to as either name), and it is the third entry in Park’s vengeance trilogy, coming in after Sympathy for Mr. Vengeance, and Oldboy. In a very self-explanatory way, the title reveals the purpose behind each of the films: to create empathy for the monster, both through effective storytelling, and heightened artistic vision. Monsters aren’t born, they are created, and by revealing the backstory and inner thoughts of his afflicted characters, Park reveals the dark paths that led each of his cinematic children to the destructive acts that they commit. After taking the fall for her and her partner’s heinous crimes, Geum-ja Lee spends some time in prison, where she retains her angelic reputation, while at the same time, gains momentum as a rumored witch and beautiful murderer. Upon her release, everyone who knows Geum-ja Lee expects her to return to the sweet, obedient naive girl that they once knew, but they don’t see the evil inside of her, rotting her from the inside out. Through blood red eye shadow, a neo-noir trench coat, sky high heels, and an embellished pistol, Guem-ja Lee brings the monster inside of her to the surface, and crosses a threshold from the land of purity, into the darkness of retribution.

    stoker-mv-12

    3. Stoker
     
    India Stoker’s mother will never approve of her. She sees something deadly coursing through India’s veins, and even if the blood that rushes through India’s arteries matches hers, she still can’t find it in her heart to truly love her daughter. These are stubborn, immovable facts that India cannot change, no matter how much she secretly desires her mother’s approval. The only control India has over the situation is her acceptance of these unpleasant truths, and her willingness to move on from them. After India is violently shoved into adulthood by the death of her father, her evolution into womanhood is kickstarted, as she learns that growing up is as much about accepting your circumstances as it is about transitioning from school girl shoes to heeled pumps.

    02

    4. J.S.A.: Joint Security Area (Gongdong gyeongbi guyeok JSA)
     
    People tend to look back on history in the simplest of terms, in order to make the unpleasant realities of conquest easier to understand and accept. One side is evil and the other is innocent; one leader is mad and the other sane — these are the lies we feed ourselves to lessen the stressful and often painful analysis of our ancestors, likening their actions to the black and white static characters that fill our television screens; a protagonist and an antagonist, nothing more. However, as much as we’d like to believe that there are only two sides to each wartime story — a right and a wrong — the truth is, nations are much more complex than that, and one united mode of thinking cannot be used to describe the entirety of every single person involved in such a massive struggle. Take, for instance, the story of two friends, one fighting on the side of South Korea, and the other representing North Korea. They might have been born into opposing camps, but thanks to a strange introduction in a joint security area, the two men originally trained to be enemies find friendship blossoming over the line that divides them.

    3_1

    5. Oldboy (Oldeuboi)
     
    Oh Dae-su is isolated in a cage of eternal television, scratched up wallpaper, and sleeping gas. It seems like it’s been a lifetime since he was first kidnapped and thrown into this room on the eve of his daughter’s birthday, but according to the ink etched into his hand, it’s been about fifteen years; just shy of two decades. Suddenly, one day, he is finally released into the world again — but his freedom comes at a price. He is given five days to figure out who imprisoned him in the first place, and why he or she locked him away for so many years in that awful room. Along his path to revenge, Oh Dae-su finds a friend in Mi-do, a local sushi chef who tries her best to aid him in seeking the truth. Together, they unearth secrets that are rooted in issues far more taboo than either of them could have imagined, and discover that the answer to their questions doesn’t lie in the reason why Oh Dae-su was locked up, but rather, why he was freed. Based on the Korean manga by the same name, Oldboy is arguably Park’s masterpiece. Equal parts revenge flick and tragic love story, Park beautifully weaves a tale of a man doomed to his own fate, set in motion by a childhood mistake. Min sik-Choi delivers a breathtaking performance as Oh Dae-su, the man pushed to the edge of his sanity, and forced to sacrifice his soul in exchange for his long-awaited vengeance. In the years spent walled up in that dark and damp enclosure, Dae-su spent his days training for battle; readying himself for the showdown that was rightfully his. However, even if Dae-su reaches the end of his journey and unmasks and defeats his oppressor, will there be any part of the man he once was still intact to enjoy his victory? Is revenge justified if it means leaving the person you were behind and starting anew? Using exploitation, bright, vivid imagery, and a gorgeous ballroom score by his longtime partner Yeong-wook Jo, Oldboy seeks to explore these questions, as director Park dives head first into one of his favorite discussion topics — individual perception of morality. By challenging society’s definition of acceptable behavior, Park once again manages to reach out and touch his audience with his odd yet enticing material, forcing the viewers to confront themselves with their own conventions, and push the boundaries of what most people are willing to accept as “normal”.

Editorials

What’s Wrong with My Baby!? Larry Cohen’s ‘It’s Alive’ at 50

Published

on

Netflix It's Alive

Soon after the New Hollywood generation took over the entertainment industry, they started having children. And more than any filmmakers that came before—they were terrified. Rosemary’s Baby (1968), The Exorcist (1973), The Omen (1976), Eraserhead (1977), The Brood (1979), The Shining (1980), Possession (1981), and many others all deal, at least in part, with the fears of becoming or being a parent. What if my child turns out to be a monster? is corrupted by some evil force? or turns out to be the fucking Antichrist? What if I screw them up somehow, or can’t help them, or even go insane and try to kill them? Horror has always been at its best when exploring relatable fears through extreme circumstances. A prime example of this is Larry Cohen’s 1974 monster-baby movie It’s Alive, which explores the not only the rollercoaster of emotions that any parent experiences when confronted with the difficulties of raising a child, but long-standing questions of who or what is at fault when something goes horribly wrong.

Cohen begins making his underlying points early in the film as Frank Davis (John P. Ryan) discusses the state of the world with a group of expectant fathers in a hospital waiting room. They discuss the “overabundance of lead” in foods and the environment, smog, and pesticides that only serve to produce roaches that are “bigger, stronger, and harder to kill.” Frank comments that this is “quite a world to bring a kid into.” This has long been a discussion point among people when trying to decide whether to have kids or not. I’ve had many conversations with friends who have said they feel it’s irresponsible to bring children into such a violent, broken, and dangerous world, and I certainly don’t begrudge them this. My wife and I did decide to have children but that doesn’t mean that it’s been easy.

Immediately following this scene comes It’s Alive’s most famous sequence in which Frank’s wife Lenore (Sharon Farrell) is the only person left alive in her delivery room, the doctors clawed and bitten to death by her mutant baby, which has escaped. “What does my baby look like!? What’s wrong with my baby!?” she screams as nurses wheel her frantically into a recovery room. The evening that had begun with such joy and excitement at the birth of their second child turned into a nightmare. This is tough for me to write, but on some level, I can relate to this whiplash of emotion. When my second child was born, they came about five weeks early. I’ll use the pronouns “they/them” for privacy reasons when referring to my kids. Our oldest was still very young and went to stay with my parents and we sped off to the hospital where my wife was taken into an operating room for an emergency c-section. I was able to carry our newborn into the NICU (natal intensive care unit) where I was assured that this was routine for all premature births. The nurses assured me there was nothing to worry about and the baby looked big and healthy. I headed to where my wife was taken to recover to grab a few winks assuming that everything was fine. Well, when I awoke, I headed back over to the NICU to find that my child was not where I left them. The nurse found me and told me that the baby’s lungs were underdeveloped, and they had to put them in a special room connected to oxygen tubes and wires to monitor their vitals.

It’s difficult to express the fear that overwhelmed me in those moments. Everything turned out okay, but it took a while and I’m convinced to this day that their anxiety struggles spring from these first weeks of life. As our children grew, we learned that two of the three were on the spectrum and that anxiety, depression, ADHD, and OCD were also playing a part in their lives. Parents, at least speaking for myself, can’t help but blame themselves for the struggles their children face. The “if only” questions creep in and easily overcome the voices that assure us that it really has nothing to do with us. In the film, Lenore says, “maybe it’s all the pills I’ve been taking that brought this on.” Frank muses aloud about how he used to think that Frankenstein was the monster, but when he got older realized he was the one that made the monster. The aptly named Frank is wondering if his baby’s mutation is his fault, if he created the monster that is terrorizing Los Angeles. I have made plenty of “if only” statements about myself over the years. “If only I hadn’t had to work so much, if only I had been around more when they were little.” Mothers may ask themselves, “did I have a drink, too much coffee, or a cigarette before I knew I was pregnant? Was I too stressed out during the pregnancy?” In other words, most parents can’t help but wonder if it’s all their fault.

At one point in the film, Frank goes to the elementary school where his baby has been sighted and is escorted through the halls by police. He overhears someone comment about “screwed up genes,” which brings about age-old questions of nature vs. nurture. Despite the voices around him from doctors and detectives that say, “we know this isn’t your fault,” Frank can’t help but think it is, and that the people who try to tell him it isn’t really think it’s his fault too. There is no doubt that there is a hereditary element to the kinds of mental illness struggles that my children and I deal with. But, and it’s a bit but, good parenting goes a long way in helping children deal with these struggles. Kids need to know they’re not alone, a good parent can provide that, perhaps especially parents that can relate to the same kinds of struggles. The question of nature vs. nurture will likely never be entirely answered but I think there’s more than a good chance that “both/and” is the case. Around the midpoint of the film, Frank agrees to disown the child and sign it over for medical experimentation if caught or killed. Lenore and the older son Chris (Daniel Holzman) seek to nurture and teach the baby, feeling that it is not a monster, but a member of the family.

It’s Alive takes these ideas to an even greater degree in the fact that the Davis Baby really is a monster, a mutant with claws and fangs that murders and eats people. The late ’60s and early ’70s also saw the rise in mass murderers and serial killers which heightened the nature vs. nurture debate. Obviously, these people were not literal monsters but human beings that came from human parents, but something had gone horribly wrong. Often the upbringing of these killers clearly led in part to their antisocial behavior, but this isn’t always the case. It’s Alive asks “what if a ‘monster’ comes from a good home?” In this case is it society, environmental factors, or is it the lead, smog, and pesticides? It is almost impossible to know, but the ending of the film underscores an uncomfortable truth—even monsters have parents.

As the film enters its third act, Frank joins the hunt for his child through the Los Angeles sewers and into the L.A. River. He is armed with a rifle and ready to kill on sight, having divorced himself from any relationship to the child. Then Frank finds his baby crying in the sewers and his fatherly instincts take over. With tears in his eyes, he speaks words of comfort and wraps his son in his coat. He holds him close, pats and rocks him, and whispers that everything is going to be okay. People often wonder how the parents of those who perform heinous acts can sit in court, shed tears, and defend them. I think it’s a complex issue. I’m sure that these parents know that their child has done something evil, but that doesn’t change the fact that they are still their baby. Your child is a piece of yourself formed into a whole new human being. Disowning them would be like cutting off a limb, no matter what they may have done. It doesn’t erase an evil act, far from it, but I can understand the pain of a parent in that situation. I think It’s Alive does an exceptional job placing its audience in that situation.

Despite the serious issues and ideas being examined in the film, It’s Alive is far from a dour affair. At heart, it is still a monster movie and filled with a sense of fun and a great deal of pitch-black humor. In one of its more memorable moments, a milkman is sucked into the rear compartment of his truck as red blood mingles with the white milk from smashed bottles leaking out the back of the truck and streaming down the street. Just after Frank agrees to join the hunt for his baby, the film cuts to the back of an ice cream truck with the words “STOP CHILDREN” emblazoned on it. It’s a movie filled with great kills, a mutant baby—created by make-up effects master Rick Baker early in his career, and plenty of action—and all in a PG rated movie! I’m telling you, the ’70s were wild. It just also happens to have some thoughtful ideas behind it as well.

Which was Larry Cohen’s specialty. Cohen made all kinds of movies, but his most enduring have been his horror films and all of them tackle the social issues and fears of the time they were made. God Told Me To (1976), Q: The Winged Serpent (1982), and The Stuff (1985) are all great examples of his socially aware, low-budget, exploitation filmmaking with a brain and It’s Alive certainly fits right in with that group. Cohen would go on to write and direct two sequels, It Lives Again (aka It’s Alive 2) in 1978 and It’s Alive III: Island of the Alive in 1987 and is credited as a co-writer on the 2008 remake. All these films explore the ideas of parental responsibility in light of the various concerns of the times they were made including abortion rights and AIDS.

Fifty years after It’s Alive was initially released, it has only become more relevant in the ensuing years. Fears surrounding parenthood have been with us since the beginning of time but as the years pass the reasons for these fears only seem to become more and more profound. In today’s world the conversation of the fathers in the waiting room could be expanded to hormones and genetic modifications in food, terrorism, climate change, school and other mass shootings, and other threats that were unknown or at least less of a concern fifty years ago. Perhaps the fearmongering conspiracy theories about chemtrails and vaccines would be mentioned as well, though in a more satirical fashion, as fears some expectant parents encounter while endlessly doomscrolling Facebook or Twitter. Speaking for myself, despite the struggles, the fears, and the sadness that sometimes comes with having children, it’s been worth it. The joys ultimately outweigh all of that, but I understand the terror too. Becoming a parent is no easy choice, nor should it be. But as I look back, I can say that I’m glad we made the choice we did.

I wonder if Frank and Lenore can say the same thing.

Continue Reading